"Duke officials took a closer look at her work and didn't like what they
saw. Fifteen of her papers, mostly dealing with pulmonary biology, have
now been retracted, with many notices citing "unreliable" data. Several
others have been modified with either partial retractions, expressions
of concern, or corrections. And last month, a U.S. district court
unsealed a whistleblower lawsuit filed by a former colleague of
Potts-Kant."
Whistleblower sues Duke, claims doctored data helped win $200 million in grants
No comments:
Post a Comment