"The scientific consensus does not view extrasensory perception as a scientific phenomenon.[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Skeptics have pointed out that there is no viable theory to explain the mechanism behind ESP, and that there are historical cases in which flaws have been discovered in the experimental design of parapsychological studies.[33] (Wikipedia)
- - - - - - -Parapsychologists ("para" = "outside of") and other pseudoscientists ("pseudo" = false) persist in criticizing science for its findings regarding ESP. Wikipedia (rated "Least Biased") unequivocally supports the stance of science. Mic-drop.
What is more reasonable: parapsychologists/paranormal promoters are discriminated against; they are being exposed as pseudoscientists? If these pseudoscientists are correct, there should be a Nobel prize for such by now. I will side with science 100% of the time. Pseudoscientists can continue to play in their "wishful thinking" sandbox all they want, but society has to marginalize all of it.