"I could go on with multiple other examples, but the point remains. For
the vast majority of cancers, intensive screening after curative
treatment does not result in prolong survival, and, even when there is
evidence that it does, such as in colorectal cancer, the survival
benefit reported is variable and at best very modest. That means that
the overall message to oncologists for most cancers is: Don’t be
ordering CT scans every six months or following tumor markers every
three months. It’s a viewpoint that oncologists have resisted but are
finally coming around to. It’s also a viewpoint that is not popular with
patients, as you will see."
When science- and evidence-based guidelines conflict with patient wishes: What’s a doc to do?
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Showing posts with label Medical Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medical Ethics. Show all posts
Monday, October 3, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)