"This suggests that while Popper’s idea of falsification is a good one,
it is far too difficult for scientists to implement regularly in
practice. Science plods along just fine without adhering to Popper’s
overly burdensome guidelines."
Falsification: Was Karl Popper Wrong About Science?
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Showing posts with label Scientific Model. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scientific Model. Show all posts
Friday, August 19, 2016
Thursday, August 18, 2016
Using Climate Change As A Scientific Model To Educate Science Deniers
"Cox does an excellent job emphasizing the model building nature of
science. I think “scientific model” is the best term to use when
discussing the nature of science (and here are three scientific words everyone should stop using).
What Climate Change Skeptics Aren’t Getting About Science
What Climate Change Skeptics Aren’t Getting About Science
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Labels
Choose how you look at reality wisely. Yes, it is a binary choice.
Click on image
SCIENCE JUSTIFIES ITSELF
Click on image