- - - - - - - - -
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
One doesn't have to go far in the "Trump Era" to find media personalities promoting the idea that taxation is theft, especially in financial media. This Wikipedia page presents the history and support of this ideology, along with representative statements supporting the legality and ethics of taxation. Also, click on the link below for a clear and succinct argument against the claim that taxation is theft:
No, it's not your money: why taxation isn't theft
Applying this taxation ethic, using public funds from taxes for various societal benefits is supported by science as cost-effective. John Oliver gets it.
There probably is no greater point of contention in politics and economics than tax policy. While it is clear that the US Constitution gives Congress the authority to levy federal taxes, whether such should be a "flat" income tax (same percentage of income for all) versus a so-called progressive income tax (gradual increase in the percentage of tax according to income), there is a legitimate debate. Those who favor the "flat" tax usually modify it through an exemption of income up to a certain level and include various "loopholes." Those who favor the progressive income tax frequently point to the precedence for such in legal decisions historically. Click on the link below for a legal analysis of the issue and the support for the progressive tax.
"To Lay and Collect Taxes": The Constitutional Case for Progressive Taxation