"Catholic doctrine still maintains that a literal Adam and Eve must have existed, a primal couple who committed that personal original sin, which occasioned the need for, and the divine promise of, the coming of the Redeemer, Jesus Christ."
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2015/02/17/another-catholic-defends-the-historicity-of-adam-and-eve/
How many Catholics who really understand science accept this? Accept Catholic teaching and unequivocally reject science, or vise versa.
While Papal Encyclicals are not "infallible"and doctrine found in them could change, all Catholics still are obligated to adhere to the pronouncements within Encyclicals. So, what is the practical difference? The fact is that the Catholic Church has a Tradition based on a literal interpretation of Genesis since its beginning. It was encapsulated in the 1950 Encyclical and all Catholics are obligated to accept it.
http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis.html
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/thechurch/encyclicals/docauthority.htm
In previous Church history regarding its doctrine conflicting with science, the Church eventually changed its opinion under the pressure from science. However, it has been 65 years since the Encyclical in question has been held up as doctrine that MUST be believed to be a Catholic in good standing. The language is unequivocal. The scientific facts against the literal interpretation have been snowballing since 1950. Will the Church accept what science has found regarding the origins of humans? This is a VERY important question because, unlike the other reversals of the Church in the face of science, acceptance of human origins facts from science would be the death knell for Christianity, and it knows it.
If you are a Catholic, do you accept the full science on the origins of humans and, if so, why are you a Catholic?
- - - - -
This is a fascinating article on human history. WARNING: any theist of the Abrahamic religions had best read with caution. This is a slam-dunk against the myth of Adam and Eve and "Original Sin": no Adam and Eve, no Original Sin, no need for Jesus.
Editor's
Note: This article is a modified excerpt from the international
bestseller Sapiens. Despite the benefits of fire, 150,000 years ago
humans were still...
realclearscience.com
- - - - -
"Although modern humans are the only human lineage alive today, other human species once roamed the Earth. These extinct lineages were members of the genus Homo just as modern humans are."
Just more evidence (that 4-letter word religious Fundamentalist are allergic to) that the Genesis human origins story is mythical.
http://www.livescience.com/50032-earliest-human-species-possibly-found.html
- - - - -
"Although modern humans are the only human lineage alive today, other human species once roamed the Earth. These extinct lineages were members of the genus Homo just as modern humans are."
Just more evidence (that 4-letter word religious Fundamentalist are allergic to) that the Genesis human origins story is mythical.
http://www.livescience.com/50032-earliest-human-species-possibly-found.html
No comments:
Post a Comment