Using An Unsupported Conclusion As An Assumption Is An Abuse Of Logic

I have state many times that all arguments for a god are the logical fallacy of argument from ignorance, or the "God of the Gaps" logical fallacy.  Another major example of the apologist's misuse of logic is to insert an unsupported conclusion into an assumption (premise) position.

Five Christian Principles Used to Give the Bible a Pass (2 of 2)