Religious apologists want us to believe that oral tradition, especially from a pre-scientific age, should be a trusted method to transmit truth. If one is open-minded, and a science-based thinker, this is for you:
Our brains don’t let piddling little facts get in the way of a good story, allowing lies to infect the mind with surprising ease.
Why we can't trust our unreliable brains.
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
New Testament scholars talk about the importance of oral tradition to reach back to discover what Jesus "really said." But with EVERY telling of a bit of oral tradition, changes will creep in. Furthermore, the assumption that oral tradition preserves something Jesus may have said is based on the assumption that Jesus was a real person. The 'words of Jesus' may have all been made up: there could have been no oral tradition at all. And it is absolutely true that lies infect the mind, as well as a lot of other stuff. It is just so obvious that so much that we read in the gospels just bubbled up out of the IMAGINATIONS of the authors!
ReplyDeleteYes, David. I make the same points in a post on the blog a few weeks ago. Thanks for the comment.
Delete