"My scheme, then is this: first try the accused to see if he/she did the
crime. If the person is convicted, then tailor the punishment to the
criminal and the crime, taking into account deterrence, sequestration,
and reformation—but not retribution. The punishment, or
treatment, should be determined by experts rather than judges or juries,
though the experts don’t have to settle on a formal diagnosis.
Norway conforms to this approach much more closely than the U.S., which
may be why Norway’s prison recidivism rate is just 20% over five years,
compared to 77% percent in the U.S."
Mass murderers: mental illness or extreme ideology?
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment