"Earlier, we published an article
explaining why there is no such thing as a scientific poll. In a
nutshell, because polling relies on good but sometimes inaccurate
assumptions, it is far more art than science. As we noted, "Tweaking
[voter] turnout models is more akin to refining a cake recipe than doing
a science experiment." Still, since American pollsters are good at
their jobs, polls tend to be correct more often than not."
Nate Silver's 'Chance of Winning' Election Forecasts Are Complete Nonsense
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment