Moderate Religion Doesn't Have To Be An Enabler Of Fundamentalist Religion?

"Non-fundamentalist (i.e., moderate) religion is accused of making it easier for fundamentalist religion to survive. How? Because, as Dawkins notes, religion (both moderate and fundamentalist) promotes faith. Faith limits discourse, restricts the sort of questions that can be asked, and thus fosters delusion. By teaching their children that strong faith is virtuous, especially when one's faith is tested and manages to survive, believers strengthen all religion - not merely the moderate type."

This article presents a possible solution to the above dilemma.  Is it plausible?

Moderate Religion: Culpability and Possibility

Why Even "Moderate" Religion Is Harmful

If you are a "moderate" Christian, or other "moderate" theist, I encourage you to read these articles on the problems with your type of faith, and to consider that "moderate" religion gives cover to the extremists and facilitates the dangerous idea that "faith is a virtue":

http://bishnature.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/why-i-think-even-moderate-religion-is-wrong-harmful-and-unnecessary-and-an-alternative-approach-to-life/

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2013/07/religion-billions-into-a-black-hole-2/

http://www.atheistrev.com/2007/04/moderate-religion-culpability-and.html?utm_content=buffer8fe29&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer