Research studies in nutrition tend to make unwarranted causal conclusions from the association of two factors.
Spuds Blamed for High Blood Pressure — Really!
Human knowledge has progressed exponentially since the dawn of modern science. It is no longer reasonable to accept claims without sufficient objective evidence. The harm from religion, alternatives to medicine, conservatism, and all other false beliefs will be exposed on this blog by reporting the findings of science. This blog will also reinforce what should be the basics of education: History, Civics, Financial Literacy, Media Literacy, and Critical/Science Based Thinking.
Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts
Friday, May 20, 2016
Friday, May 6, 2016
Sunday, May 1, 2016
Skipping Breakfast And Weight Gain
"If the breakfast/weight claim were true, we’d have rigorous evidence of it by now; we don’t, so it likely isn’t."
This is a good example of poor research leading to an invalid conclusion.
Breakfast consumption was not consistently associated with differences in BMI or overweight/obesity prevalence.
This is a good example of poor research leading to an invalid conclusion.
Breakfast consumption was not consistently associated with differences in BMI or overweight/obesity prevalence.
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
More Unsettling News In Nutrition
"There is a lot of confirmation bias in nutrition and those end-oriented
beliefs make it easy to unconsciously mold results to match the numbers
to the goal, like doing surveys about food recall and subtly quantifying
the results one way or the other. Then it’s off to publish a diet book
or become an expert on the latest fad carcinogen."
Why are saturated fats healthy again? Why do the latest nutritional guidelines still have a very low cap on salt despite all the contradictory data?
Why are saturated fats healthy again? Why do the latest nutritional guidelines still have a very low cap on salt despite all the contradictory data?
Friday, April 15, 2016
Butter May Be Better, But - - -
Another example showing that nutrition and diet is a "soft" science.
Butter May Be Better Than Vegetable Oil, But Questions Remain
Butter May Be Better Than Vegetable Oil, But Questions Remain
Monday, March 21, 2016
3 Reasons Not To Buy Organic Food
- Informed confidence that we are safe buying “conventional” foods
- Recognizing that some of the best farming practices from an environmental perspective are not always allowed or practical under the organic rules
- An ethical problem with the tactics that some organic advocates and marketers employ which seriously misrepresents their “conventional” competition
A Way Of Getting Around The Ethical Question Of Eating Animals?
"We are not close to creating a full steak, but we can already create the
equivalent of ground meat, for hamburgers, meatballs, meatloaf, or
whatever you would use ground meat for."
In Praise of Lab-Grown Meat
In Praise of Lab-Grown Meat
Monday, March 7, 2016
Preventing Food Allergy
"If feeding these foods is safe, what is the minimal amount needed for
inducing tolerance to these foods? Will the regimen be as effective if
we introduce these foods at a later age but early enough before
sensitization may occur? How can we improve the preparation of foods to
make them easier for parents to administer? These questions must be
addressed before we can hope that an early-feeding strategy will be
effective at a population level. In the meantime, evidence is building
that early consumption rather than delayed introduction of foods is
likely to be more beneficial as a strategy for the primary prevention of
food allergy. So feed your children and hope that they will EAT."
Preventing Food Allergy in Infancy — Early Consumption or Avoidance?
Preventing Food Allergy in Infancy — Early Consumption or Avoidance?
Nutrition: It Is Not A "Hard" Science
"So the key question becomes how much meat should a
cognitive-health-conscious person eat. Too little can delay development
and cognition. But too much, particularly if it is low quality and mass
produced, is associated with other health concerns, such as heart
disease and cancer, along with memory problems later in life. A person's
life stage matters: pregnant women need more iron, as do babies and
children. Genetics also play a part, but we don't yet know all the
particulars. All these caveats make for a murky takeaway."
Consumption of animals helped hominins to grow bigger brains. But in a world rich with food, how necessary is meat?
Consumption of animals helped hominins to grow bigger brains. But in a world rich with food, how necessary is meat?
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
Thursday, January 28, 2016
A Healthy Diet: Not As Clear As We Think?
"Foods that make some of us put on weight can have little effect on
others, according to research being carried out in Israel. It might be
time to rethink the way we diet, writes Dr Saleyha Ashan"
Why do people put on differing amounts of weight?
Why do people put on differing amounts of weight?
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
The Clean Eating Delusion
"In practice 'clean eating' tends to be avoiding whatever food is the
latest boogeyman in the pseudoscientific diet-advice industry. Today
this often includes eating organic, avoiding GMOs, avoiding gluten, avoiding perceived 'chemicals,'
eating 'natural' which can mean many things but often means avoiding
processed foods and food additives, and sometimes eating raw foods."
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-clean-eating-delusion/
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-clean-eating-delusion/
Monday, January 4, 2016
Diet's Effect On Health Is Not A Hard Science
This article points to the reality that diet's effect on health is still not settled science.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/31/the-surprising-thing-ancient-mummies-tell-us-about-what-to-eat/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/12/31/the-surprising-thing-ancient-mummies-tell-us-about-what-to-eat/
Thursday, December 24, 2015
Science-Based Nutrition Vs Pseudoscience
"Isn’t that something? The CEO of a respected medical research organization is talking about prevention, right there in the Times.
Prevention through diet, no less. And saying it is an important area of
cancer research! Doesn’t look like the stereotypical picture of
medicine the pseudoscientific diet wizards try to sell. Doesn’t appear
that medicine is solely interested in treating the disease, not the “whole person,” as
integrative medicine proponents would have us believe. Frankly, it
appears to be — dare I say it? — positively “holistic” to me."
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/guess-who-pioneered-chemoprevention-through-diet/
https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/guess-who-pioneered-chemoprevention-through-diet/
Tuesday, November 24, 2015
Health Science Has Really Not Given Us Much Recently
"Obviously we have learned a great deal in the last 60 years, but it is perhaps surprising how little basic nutritional advice has changed. By the 1950s we had already worked out the basics of nutrition, identified all the vitamins, their role in the body, and their source in common foods. The benefits of exercise were also already being recognized, as well as maintaining a lean body mass. Everything we have learned since then, in terms of its bottom line effect on health advice, has been a small tweak, not a fundamental change."
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/health-advice-from-the-1950s/
http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/health-advice-from-the-1950s/
Monday, November 23, 2015
"Chemicals" Is Not A 4-letter Word
The "Naturalistic Fallacy" debunked. Now that this information is readily available on Facebook, I am sure all pseudoscientists and promoters of alternatives to medicine will accept this information and change their opinions. (ya, like the religious do when confronted with contradictory information)
Sunday, October 18, 2015
Science: It's On A Spectrum of Certainty
Scientific disciplines are on a spectrum of certainty, with none being completely certain. This link is a good presentation of what science isn’t:
The most certain scientific disciplines are the so-called “Hard” sciences, such as chemistry, physics and biology. The least certain sciences are the so-called “Soft” sciences, such as the social sciences, which include such disciplines as sociology, psychology, economics and politics. Depending on its use of scientific methods, history can fall on different points somewhere between the “Hard” and “Soft” sciences. Where does nutrition and medical science fall?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)