"This
is the best argument that the theists have when it comes to cosmology.
That’s because it plays by the rules. You have phenomena, you have
parameters of particle physics and cosmology, and then you have two
different models, theism and naturalism, and you want to compare which
model is the best fit for the data. I applaud that general approach.
Given that, it is still a terrible argument. It is not at all
convincing."
I was channel-surfing this afternoon and came across a Catholic physicist/priest (Fr. Spitzer) on the Catholic network EWTN. Interestingly, he used statements from Sean Carroll to support his assertion that Fine Tuning/Low Entropy points to theism. I just had to rebut such apologetics.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2014/04/sean-carroll-slaps-down-fine-tuning-argument-christianity-apologetics-craig-carroll/
I was channel-surfing this afternoon and came across a Catholic physicist/priest (Fr. Spitzer) on the Catholic network EWTN. Interestingly, he used statements from Sean Carroll to support his assertion that Fine Tuning/Low Entropy points to theism. I just had to rebut such apologetics.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/crossexamined/2014/04/sean-carroll-slaps-down-fine-tuning-argument-christianity-apologetics-craig-carroll/
No comments:
Post a Comment