"The Design Argument may sound good at first, but a close look shows that it suffers from special thinking in many ways. First, there is no reason to infer any particular god from a complex world or even one god instead of a committee.
"Second, complexity does not imply design. There are thousands of complex, functional things that are not designed.1
"Third, the Design Argument is another argument from ignorance. Even a Christian does not accept any other kind of argument from ignorance: “We don’t understand how salamanders can grow back their tails, therefore Quezelcoatl does it.” Ignorance is no argument. It is a complete lack of argument.
"Fourth, supernatural explanations have always been replaced by natural ones. So it’s very unlikely that natural phenomena will be found to have supernatural causes."
Click on the links below:
- - - - - - -
***If you disagree
with this article, how do you justify or verify that your beliefs are true?
What is your view regarding the value of evidence?***
- - - - - - -
No comments:
Post a Comment