Below is from my email feed:
- - - - - - - - -
In Critikid's latest media literacy interview, I asked Peter Adams from the News Literacy Project:
How can we judge the reliability of a website or news outlet?
He answered:
Well, first I think everyone needs to really reflect on the concept of “credibility” and think through what really makes a piece of information or a source of information credible. Is it perfection? Sources that have never made an error of fact? No, of course not – that’s such a high standard that you’d wind up being unable to trust every single information source on the planet. Is it sources that only publish things that feel good and confirm your biases? Sources that cater to and confirm your existing ideas and beliefs about the world? No, of course not.
Okay so what does credibility look like, then? What are its characteristics? Well, two of those characteristics are certainly accuracy and fairness.
Credible sources don’t:
- make things up.
- take people’s words out of context.
- misrepresent photos.
- use loaded language.
- exclude important voices and perspectives.
Credible sources are:
- transparent. Sources you trust should explain exactly how they verified what they’re reporting.
- committed to independence, honesty and the public’s interest. Credible sources strive to ensure that the information they provide is not influenced by the interests of third parties like advertisers or political parties.
- accountable. Accountability demonstrates their commitment to the truth. They acknowledge lapses in standards and ethics, and seek to address them: they correct errors when they happen; they update headlines that miss the mark; they take steps to explain their decisions to the public.
The more of these kinds of things you see from a source, the more credible you should consider it.
In the interview, Peter also walked through how to verify a claim, shared fact-checking websites, and discussed the role of AI in countering misinformation. You can read the full interview here.